Only with an overwhelming voter turnout on polling day would we have a chance to override the Electoral Commission’s underhanded tactics.
Bersih 2.0 will continue to fight for reforms and an independent commission before the coming general election.
Earlier this month, in historic legal victories, Bersih 2.0 outreach officer Chan Tsu Chong along with six others were granted leave and a stay order to challenge the Electoral Commission’s delineation proposals in Melaka.
This means the process of re-drawing the election boundaries for Melaka has been suspended until the court case is completed.
This builds upon the work already done in Selangor to challenge the new proposals.
The importance of these legal challenges for the fate of the fourteenth general election can’t be overstated.
The commission’s motivations for the new boundaries are obvious. The new boundaries are there to shift the balance of seats to secure a strong Barisan Nasional victory in the next election.
Political motivations behind the new boundaries
According to research by Politweet, the BN can win an additional 11 seats in the Selangor State Legislative Assembly with the new boundaries proposed in September 2016. These 11 seats would be won with no changes in votes from the last general election but only through the shifting of voters to strategic seats for the BN.
Similarly, in the September 2016 proposals for Melaka, the seat of Bukit Baru, won by Pakatan Rakyat by 48 votes in the last general election, would be won by the BN with a 1,600-vote majority with the new boundaries. The marginal seat of Telok Mas, won by the BN by just 700 votes in the last election, would become a safe seat with a 3,000-vote majority.
Worse, based on the September 2016 proposal, the Bukit Katil federal seat, won by Pakatan Rakyat in the last general election by nearly 7,000 votes, would now be won by the BN with a 4,800-vote majority.
This move is especially suspicious, given that in August 2016, one month before the proposal became public, the Melaka chief minister called for the commission to change the Bukit Katil boundaries to make it easier for the BN to win.
The same pattern emerges throughout the country. In Perak, the safe Pakatan Rakyat seats in the last general election of Changkat Jering and Sungai Rapat would be won by the BN, with no change in votes. In Kuala Lumpur, Nurul Izzah Anwar would lose the seat of Lembah Pantai.
For the first time in our history, the Electoral Commission is being dragged to court over and over again to stop their flagrant alleged cheating through delineation. The rakyat have shown their outrage, with more than 1,000 objections submitted to the commission between September 2016 and April 2017 over their proposals.
The commission has been inundated with legal cases on delineation. So far, 11 cases have been filed in courts across the country, challenging the lack of information provided (yes, the commission doesn’t even want to tell voters how they are affected!), the unconstitutional proposals and the commission’s refusal to hold local inquiries when legally required to do so.
So far, there have been some brave High Court judges willing to take a stand.
Judges Azizul Azmi Adnan and Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera for the Selangor and Melaka cases, respectively, have both granted leave to hear the arguments of the case and have put a stay on further action by the commission to redraw the boundaries in those two states.
The Selangor state government’s challenge is now being heard in court, and we have already heard some startling revelations from the commission, including that the information related to 136,000 addresses on the electoral roll has been destroyed.
I think it is fair to say we can expect more such ludicrous explanations from the commission as the cases progress.
What this means for the coming polls
Even though the Federal Constitution allows the Electoral Commission up to two years to complete the delineation exercise, the commission now seems to be desperate to finish the process as soon as possible. We can only wonder why this would be the case.
If the commission cared to follow the Constitution, once the court granted a stay for Selangor, this should have halted the process for the whole of the peninsula. This is because the Constitution says peninsular Malaysia must be treated as a whole unit when drawing constituencies.
However, the commission has decided to continue the delineation process “excluding the state of Selangor”. It is clear the commission is trying to bulldoze their proposal through no matter what the courts say. It shows complete contempt for the rule of law and our Federal Constitution.
On a positive note, it looks like the boundaries for the federal and state seats in Selangor may have been saved from the changes that would have led to a rigged election in a state the BN is desperate to win back.
For the rest of the country, we can only speculate what the commission’s plans are. It is now possible the commission will take the unconstitutional step of presenting their final proposals to the prime minister without completing the process for Selangor and Malacca.
The prime minister can then table the new boundaries in Parliament by the end of July and announce the dissolution of Parliament by August. The election can then be held as early as September.
Electoral Commission up to same old tricks
We are fully aware of how the process would have been conducted if the commission were not merely a puppet for the ruling party.
The Constitution is clear. Seats in the same state must have “approximately equal” number of voters and the commission must try to follow local ties in drawing the boundaries.
If the commission was fair, we would not have a seat in Selangor with more than 150,000 voters (Petaling Jaya Utara) and another with just 37,000 voters (Sabak Bernam). We would not have boundaries that cut households or communities in half to suit certain voting patterns. Local councils would not be criss-crossed with constituency boundaries, resulting in councillors having to communicate with multiple MPs on local issues.
In the past year, public confidence in the commissio has been further eroded. They have refused to supply draft electoral rolls to the public. They have allowed people to register in constituencies they have never lived in. They have restricted voter registration exercises by limiting the number of forms available. Their actions in relation to delineation should be the final nail in the coffin.
While Bersih 2.0 will continue to fight for reforms and an independent commission before the coming general election, what matters most now is the People’s Power to overcome this cheating and manipulation.
The Rakyat must once again come out and make their vote count. Only with an overwhelming voter turnout on polling day would we have a chance to override the commission’s underhanded tactics.
Zoë Randhawa is an advocacy officer for Bersih 2.0.